failure: be good for creativity

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mistake
Weight: 0.67
, breach
Weight: 0.65
, disappointment
Weight: 0.61
, obstacle
Weight: 0.61
Siblings heart failure
Weight: 0.77
, omission
Weight: 0.66
, negligence
Weight: 0.61
, communication
Weight: 0.61
, flat tire
Weight: 0.59

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for creativity 1.00
is good skill 0.80
be important skill in science 0.78
is important skill 0.78
is important leadership skill 0.76
is skill 0.76
is valuable workplace skill 0.76
is most important skill 0.76
have important skills 0.76
has quality good 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(mistake, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(failure, be good for creativity)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(disappointment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(failure, be good for creativity)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(failure, be good for creativity)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(disappointment, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(failure, be good for creativity)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(mistake, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(failure, be good for creativity)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(disappointment, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(failure, be good for creativity)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(mistake, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(failure, be good for creativity)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(communication, be important skill in science)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(failure, be good for creativity)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(communication, is skill)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(failure, be good for creativity)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(communication, is valuable workplace skill)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(mistake, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(failure, be good for creativity)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(failure, be good for creativity)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(disappointment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(failure, be good for creativity)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(failure, be good for creativity)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(failure, be good for creativity)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(communication, is valuable workplace skill)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(communication, is valuable workplace skill)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(failure, be good for creativity)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(communication, is skill)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(communication, is skill)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(failure, be good for creativity)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(communication, be important skill in science)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(communication, be important skill in science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(failure, be good for creativity)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(failure, be good for creativity)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(failure, be good for creativity)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(failure, has quality good)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(failure, be good for creativity)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(failure, has quality good)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(failure, be good for creativity)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(failure, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(failure, be good for creativity)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(failure, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(failure, be good for creativity)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(failure, be good for creativity)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(failure, be good for creativity)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(failure, be good for creativity)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(failure, be good for creativity)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(failure, be good for creativity)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(disappointment, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(failure, be good for creativity)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(mistake, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(failure, be good for creativity)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(communication, be important skill in science)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(failure, be good for creativity)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(communication, is skill)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(failure, be good for creativity)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(communication, is valuable workplace skill)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(failure, be good for creativity)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(disappointment, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(failure, be good for creativity)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(mistake, has quality good)