failure: be important process of learning

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mistake
Weight: 0.67
, breach
Weight: 0.65
, disappointment
Weight: 0.61
, obstacle
Weight: 0.61
Siblings heart failure
Weight: 0.77
, omission
Weight: 0.66
, negligence
Weight: 0.61
, communication
Weight: 0.61
, flat tire
Weight: 0.59

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important process of learning 1.00
be important learning 0.93
be important part of learning 0.92
be basic learning 0.85
has physical part process 0.85
be called process 0.83
be considered in two way process 0.82
be considered process 0.82
be thought of of process 0.81
be considered as process 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(mistake, be important learning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(failure, be important process of learning)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(failure, be important process of learning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(mistake, be important learning)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.53
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(failure, be important process of learning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(mistake, be important learning)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(failure, be important process of learning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(communication, has physical part process)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(failure, be important process of learning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(communication, be considered process)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(failure, be important process of learning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(communication, be considered in two way process)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(failure, be important process of learning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(communication, be considered as process)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(mistake, be important learning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(failure, be important process of learning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(failure, be important process of learning)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(failure, be important process of learning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(communication, has physical part process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(communication, has physical part process)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(failure, be important process of learning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(communication, be considered in two way process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(communication, be considered in two way process)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(failure, be important process of learning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(communication, be considered process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(communication, be considered process)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(failure, be important process of learning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(communication, be considered as process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(communication, be considered as process)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(failure, be important process of learning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(failure, be important process of learning)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(failure, be important process of learning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(failure, be important part of learning)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(failure, be important process of learning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(failure, be important part of learning)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(failure, be important process of learning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(failure, be important part of learning)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(failure, be important process of learning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(failure, be important part of learning)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(failure, be important process of learning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(failure, be important process of learning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(failure, be important process of learning)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(failure, be important process of learning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(failure, be important process of learning)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(failure, be important process of learning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(mistake, be important learning)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(failure, be important process of learning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(communication, has physical part process)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(failure, be important process of learning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(communication, be considered process)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(failure, be important process of learning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(communication, be considered as process)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(failure, be important process of learning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(communication, be considered in two way process)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(failure, be important process of learning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(mistake, be important learning)