failure: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mistake
Weight: 0.67
, breach
Weight: 0.65
, disappointment
Weight: 0.61
, obstacle
Weight: 0.61
Siblings heart failure
Weight: 0.77
, omission
Weight: 0.66
, negligence
Weight: 0.61
, communication
Weight: 0.61
, flat tire
Weight: 0.59

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
be good 0.86
has quality wrong 0.85
be important in quality management 0.82
is good major 0.78
be important in total quality management 0.78
is good thing 0.78
have good side 0.78
is good skill 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(breach, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(failure, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(mistake, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(failure, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(disappointment, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(failure, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(mistake, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(failure, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(disappointment, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(failure, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(disappointment, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(failure, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(disappointment, have good side) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(failure, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(disappointment, have good side) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(failure, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(failure, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(disappointment, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(failure, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(mistake, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(failure, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(disappointment, is good thing)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(failure, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(disappointment, have good side)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(failure, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(disappointment, have good side)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(failure, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(disappointment, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(failure, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(mistake, has quality bad)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(failure, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(breach, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.58
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(failure, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(disappointment, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(failure, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(mistake, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(failure, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(disappointment, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(failure, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(mistake, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(failure, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(breach, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(failure, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(disappointment, is good thing)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(failure, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(disappointment, have good side)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(failure, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(disappointment, have good side)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(failure, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(negligence, has quality bad)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(failure, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(heart failure, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(failure, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(negligence, has quality wrong)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(failure, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(communication, be important in total quality management)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(mistake, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(failure, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(failure, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(disappointment, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(failure, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(failure, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(breach, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(failure, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(failure, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(mistake, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(failure, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(failure, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(disappointment, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(failure, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(failure, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(disappointment, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(failure, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(failure, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(disappointment, have good side) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(failure, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(failure, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(disappointment, have good side) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(failure, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(failure, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(failure, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(heart failure, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(heart failure, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(failure, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(negligence, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(negligence, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(failure, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(negligence, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(negligence, has quality wrong)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(failure, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(communication, be important in total quality management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(communication, be important in total quality management)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(failure, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(failure, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(failure, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(failure, be good)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(failure, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(failure, be good)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(failure, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(failure, be good)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(failure, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(failure, is good thing)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(failure, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(failure, be good)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(failure, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(failure, is good thing)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(failure, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(failure, is good thing)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(failure, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(failure, is good thing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(failure, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(failure, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(failure, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(failure, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(failure, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(failure, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(disappointment, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(failure, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(mistake, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(failure, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(disappointment, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(failure, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(mistake, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(failure, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(breach, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(failure, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(disappointment, is good thing)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(failure, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(disappointment, have good side)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(failure, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(disappointment, have good side)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(failure, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(negligence, has quality bad)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(failure, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(heart failure, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(failure, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(negligence, has quality wrong)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(failure, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(communication, be important in total quality management)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(failure, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(disappointment, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(failure, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(mistake, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(failure, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(disappointment, have good side)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(failure, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(disappointment, have good side)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(failure, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(disappointment, is good thing)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(failure, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(disappointment, has quality bad)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(failure, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(mistake, has quality bad)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(failure, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(breach, has quality bad)