failure: is for

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mistake
Weight: 0.67
, breach
Weight: 0.65
, disappointment
Weight: 0.61
, obstacle
Weight: 0.61
Siblings heart failure
Weight: 0.77
, omission
Weight: 0.66
, negligence
Weight: 0.61
, communication
Weight: 0.61
, flat tire
Weight: 0.59

Related properties

Property Similarity
is for 1.00
is yokohama 0.87
is scarse 0.87
is zootopia 0.87
be important for tcrm 0.83
was in 1900s 0.79
was in 1810 0.79
be important for business 0.76
is time 0.76
is just because 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(mistake, is zootopia)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(failure, is for)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(mistake, is just because)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(failure, is for)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(breach, is time)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(failure, is for)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(failure, is for)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(mistake, is zootopia)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(failure, is for)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(breach, is time)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(failure, is for)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(mistake, is just because)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(failure, is for)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(mistake, is zootopia)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(failure, is for)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(mistake, is just because)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(failure, is for)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(breach, is time)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(failure, is for)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(flat tire, is yokohama)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(failure, is for)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(communication, was in 1900s)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(failure, is for)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(communication, was in 1810)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(failure, is for)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(communication, be important for tcrm)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(mistake, is zootopia)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(failure, is for)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(failure, is for)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(mistake, is just because)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(failure, is for)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(failure, is for)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(breach, is time)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(failure, is for)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(failure, is for)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(failure, is for)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(flat tire, is yokohama)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(flat tire, is yokohama)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(failure, is for)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(communication, be important for tcrm)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(communication, be important for tcrm)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(failure, is for)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(communication, was in 1810)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(communication, was in 1810)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(failure, is for)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(communication, was in 1900s)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(communication, was in 1900s)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(failure, is for)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(failure, is for)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(failure, is for)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(failure, is for)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(failure, is for)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(failure, is for)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(failure, is for)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(failure, is for)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(mistake, is zootopia)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(failure, is for)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(breach, is time)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(failure, is for)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(mistake, is just because)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(failure, is for)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(flat tire, is yokohama)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(failure, is for)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(communication, be important for tcrm)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(failure, is for)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(communication, was in 1900s)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(failure, is for)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(communication, was in 1810)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(failure, is for)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(breach, is time)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(failure, is for)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(mistake, is zootopia)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(failure, is for)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(mistake, is just because)