fall: be season with 2 names

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents rise
Weight: 0.63
, blow
Weight: 0.61
, hit
Weight: 0.61
, mistake
Weight: 0.60
Siblings falling
Weight: 0.34
, slide
Weight: 0.34
, jump
Weight: 0.33
, creep
Weight: 0.32
, down
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be season with 2 names 1.00
have 2 names 0.88
have two names 0.84
is season 0.84
is season called 0.82
is good season 0.81
is best season 0.80
be in 3 stars 0.77
is back year 0.76
is worst season 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(hit, be in 3 stars)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(fall, be season with 2 names)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(fall, be season with 2 names)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(hit, be in 3 stars)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(fall, be season with 2 names)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(hit, be in 3 stars)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(hit, be in 3 stars)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(fall, be season with 2 names)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(fall, be season with 2 names)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(fall, be season with 2 names)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(fall, be season with 2 names)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(fall, be season with 2 names)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(fall, have 2 names)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(fall, be season with 2 names)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(fall, have 2 names)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(fall, be season with 2 names)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(fall, have 2 names)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(fall, be season with 2 names)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(fall, have two names)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(fall, be season with 2 names)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(fall, have two names)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(fall, be season with 2 names)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(fall, is season)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(fall, be season with 2 names)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(fall, is season)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(fall, be season with 2 names)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(fall, is season called)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(fall, be season with 2 names)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(fall, is good season)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(fall, be season with 2 names)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(fall, is season called)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(fall, be season with 2 names)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(fall, is good season)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(fall, be season with 2 names)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(fall, have two names)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(fall, be season with 2 names)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(fall, is season)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(fall, be season with 2 names)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(fall, is good season)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(fall, be season with 2 names)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(fall, is season called)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(fall, be season with 2 names)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(fall, is best season)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(fall, be season with 2 names)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(fall, is best season)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(fall, be season with 2 names)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(fall, is best season)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(fall, be season with 2 names)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(fall, is worst season)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(fall, be season with 2 names)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(fall, is worst season)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(fall, be season with 2 names)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(fall, have 2 names)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(fall, be season with 2 names)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(fall, is worst season)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(fall, be season with 2 names)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(fall, is good season)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(fall, be season with 2 names)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(fall, have two names)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(fall, be season with 2 names)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(fall, is season called)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(fall, be season with 2 names)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(fall, is best season)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(fall, be season with 2 names)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(fall, is season)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(fall, be season with 2 names)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(fall, is worst season)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(fall, be season with 2 names)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(fall, be season with 2 names)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(fall, be season with 2 names)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(fall, be season with 2 names)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(fall, be season with 2 names)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(fall, be season with 2 names)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(hit, be in 3 stars)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(fall, be season with 2 names)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(hit, be in 3 stars)