fame: is bad thing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents movie
Weight: 0.62
, tv show
Weight: 0.61
, television series
Weight: 0.60
, celebrity
Weight: 0.60
, show
Weight: 0.60
Siblings movie star
Weight: 0.34
, glory
Weight: 0.34
, idol
Weight: 0.33
, star
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is bad thing 1.00
is thing 0.94
has quality bad 0.79
is like 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(fame, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(idol, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(fame, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(idol, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(idol, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(fame, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(fame, is bad thing)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(fame, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(fame, is thing)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(fame, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(fame, is thing)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(fame, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(fame, has quality bad)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(fame, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(fame, has quality bad)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(fame, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(fame, has quality bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(fame, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(fame, has quality bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(fame, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(fame, is like)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(fame, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(fame, is like)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(fame, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(fame, is thing)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(fame, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(fame, is like)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(fame, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(fame, is like)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(fame, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(fame, is thing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(fame, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(fame, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(fame, is bad thing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(fame, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(fame, is bad thing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(fame, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(idol, has quality bad)