famine: be in south sudan

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tragedy
Weight: 0.64
, problem
Weight: 0.59
, catastrophe
Weight: 0.58
, word
Weight: 0.56
Siblings starvation
Weight: 0.35
, hunger
Weight: 0.34
, desertification
Weight: 0.33
, overpopulation
Weight: 0.32
, flood
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in south sudan 1.00
be in east africa 0.82
be in north korea 0.81
be in ethiopia 0.75
be in somalia 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(famine, be in south sudan)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(starvation, be in north korea)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(famine, be in south sudan)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(starvation, be in somalia)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(famine, be in south sudan)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(starvation, be in ethiopia)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(famine, be in south sudan)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(starvation, be in somalia)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(starvation, be in somalia)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(famine, be in south sudan)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(starvation, be in ethiopia)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(starvation, be in ethiopia)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(famine, be in south sudan)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(starvation, be in north korea)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(starvation, be in north korea)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(famine, be in south sudan)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(famine, be in south sudan)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(famine, be in south sudan)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(famine, be in north korea)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(famine, be in south sudan)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(famine, be in north korea)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(famine, be in south sudan)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(famine, be in somalia)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(famine, be in south sudan)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(famine, be in north korea)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(famine, be in south sudan)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(famine, be in somalia)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(famine, be in south sudan)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(famine, be in somalia)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(famine, be in south sudan)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(famine, be in east africa)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(famine, be in south sudan)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(famine, be in north korea)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(famine, be in south sudan)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(famine, be in somalia)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(famine, be in south sudan)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(famine, be in ethiopia)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(famine, be in south sudan)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(famine, be in east africa)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(famine, be in south sudan)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(famine, be in east africa)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(famine, be in south sudan)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(famine, be in ethiopia)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(famine, be in south sudan)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(famine, be in ethiopia)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(famine, be in south sudan)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(famine, be in east africa)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(famine, be in south sudan)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(famine, be in ethiopia)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(famine, be in south sudan)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(famine, be in south sudan)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(famine, be in south sudan)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(famine, be in south sudan)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(famine, be in south sudan)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(famine, be in south sudan)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(starvation, be in somalia)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(famine, be in south sudan)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(starvation, be in ethiopia)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(famine, be in south sudan)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(starvation, be in north korea)