famine: has state problem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tragedy
Weight: 0.64
, problem
Weight: 0.59
, catastrophe
Weight: 0.58
, word
Weight: 0.56
Siblings starvation
Weight: 0.35
, hunger
Weight: 0.34
, desertification
Weight: 0.33
, overpopulation
Weight: 0.32
, flood
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state problem 1.00
be ongoing problem 0.81
is issue 0.78
be problem in africa 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(famine, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(hunger, has state problem)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(famine, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(desertification, has state problem)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(famine, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, has state problem)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(famine, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in africa)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(famine, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(hunger, be problem in africa)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(famine, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(hunger, is issue)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(famine, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(starvation, has state problem)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(famine, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is issue)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(famine, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(starvation, be problem in africa)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(famine, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(starvation, is issue)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(famine, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(starvation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(starvation, has state problem)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(famine, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(hunger, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(hunger, has state problem)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(famine, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(desertification, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(desertification, has state problem)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(famine, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(overpopulation, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, has state problem)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(famine, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(starvation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(starvation, is issue)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(famine, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(overpopulation, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is issue)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(famine, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(hunger, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(hunger, is issue)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(famine, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(hunger, be problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(hunger, be problem in africa)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(famine, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(overpopulation, be problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, be problem in africa)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(famine, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(starvation, be problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(starvation, be problem in africa)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(famine, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(famine, has state problem)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(famine, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(famine, is issue)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(famine, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(famine, is issue)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(famine, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(famine, is issue)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(famine, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(famine, be problem in africa)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(famine, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(famine, be problem in africa)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(famine, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(famine, be ongoing problem)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(famine, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(famine, be ongoing problem)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(famine, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(famine, be ongoing problem)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(famine, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(famine, be problem in africa)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(famine, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(famine, be problem in africa)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(famine, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(famine, is issue)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(famine, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(famine, be ongoing problem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(famine, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(famine, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(famine, has state problem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(famine, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(famine, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(famine, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(starvation, has state problem)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(famine, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(starvation, is issue)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(famine, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is issue)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(famine, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(hunger, has state problem)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(famine, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(desertification, has state problem)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(famine, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(hunger, is issue)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(famine, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(overpopulation, has state problem)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(famine, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(hunger, be problem in africa)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(famine, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(overpopulation, be problem in africa)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(famine, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(starvation, be problem in africa)