famine: relate to ancient israel

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tragedy
Weight: 0.64
, problem
Weight: 0.59
, catastrophe
Weight: 0.58
, word
Weight: 0.56
Siblings starvation
Weight: 0.35
, hunger
Weight: 0.34
, desertification
Weight: 0.33
, overpopulation
Weight: 0.32
, flood
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
relate to ancient israel 1.00
relate to israel 0.93
be in ethiopia 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(famine, relate to ancient israel)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(starvation, be in ethiopia)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(famine, relate to ancient israel)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(starvation, be in ethiopia)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(starvation, be in ethiopia)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(famine, relate to ancient israel)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(famine, relate to ancient israel)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(famine, relate to ancient israel)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(famine, relate to israel)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(famine, relate to ancient israel)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(famine, relate to israel)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(famine, relate to ancient israel)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(famine, relate to israel)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(famine, relate to ancient israel)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(famine, be in ethiopia)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(famine, relate to ancient israel)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(famine, relate to israel)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(famine, relate to ancient israel)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(famine, be in ethiopia)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(famine, relate to ancient israel)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(famine, be in ethiopia)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(famine, relate to ancient israel)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(famine, be in ethiopia)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(famine, relate to ancient israel)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(famine, relate to ancient israel)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(famine, relate to ancient israel)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(famine, relate to ancient israel)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(famine, relate to ancient israel)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(famine, relate to ancient israel)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(starvation, be in ethiopia)