fang: is attractive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tooth
Weight: 0.48
, venom
Weight: 0.44
, detail
Weight: 0.43
, time
Weight: 0.41
Siblings wisdom tooth
Weight: 0.31
, tooth decay
Weight: 0.30
, jaw
Weight: 0.30
, molar
Weight: 0.29
, tattoo
Weight: 0.28

Related properties

Property Similarity
is attractive 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(fang, is attractive)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(jaw, is attractive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(fang, is attractive)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(jaw, is attractive)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(jaw, is attractive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(fang, is attractive)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(fang, is attractive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(fang, is attractive)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(fang, is attractive)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(fang, is attractive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(fang, is attractive)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(fang, is attractive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(fang, is attractive)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(jaw, is attractive)