farm: is raised

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents estate
Weight: 0.64
, family
Weight: 0.61
, real estate
Weight: 0.60
, animal
Weight: 0.59
, organization
Weight: 0.58
Siblings real estate agent
Weight: 0.34
, breeder
Weight: 0.34
, cattle
Weight: 0.34
, llama
Weight: 0.34
, mountain goat
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is raised 1.00
be raised for environment 0.91
be raised fish bad 0.85
raised salmon 0.79
be raised salmon unhealthy 0.76
raised better salmon taste 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(farm, is raised) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(cattle, is raised)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(farm, is raised) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(cattle, is raised) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(cattle, is raised)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(farm, is raised) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(farm, is raised)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(farm, is raised) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(farm, be raised for environment)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(farm, is raised) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(farm, be raised fish bad)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(farm, is raised) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(farm, raised salmon)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(farm, is raised) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(farm, be raised salmon unhealthy)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(farm, is raised) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(farm, raised better salmon taste)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(farm, is raised) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(farm, be raised for environment)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(farm, is raised) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(farm, be raised fish bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(farm, is raised) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(farm, be raised for environment)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(farm, is raised) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(farm, raised salmon)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(farm, is raised) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(farm, be raised salmon unhealthy)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(farm, is raised) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(farm, be raised for environment)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(farm, is raised) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(farm, raised better salmon taste)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(farm, is raised) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(farm, be raised fish bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(farm, is raised) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(farm, raised salmon)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(farm, is raised) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(farm, be raised salmon unhealthy)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(farm, is raised) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(farm, raised better salmon taste)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(farm, is raised) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(farm, be raised fish bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(farm, is raised) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(farm, raised better salmon taste)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(farm, is raised) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(farm, raised salmon)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(farm, is raised) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(farm, be raised salmon unhealthy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(farm, is raised) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(farm, is raised) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(farm, is raised)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(farm, is raised) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(farm, is raised)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(farm, is raised) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(cattle, is raised)