farmer: be lack of soil

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents man
Weight: 0.64
, person
Weight: 0.63
, member
Weight: 0.62
, producer
Weight: 0.61
Siblings ollie
Weight: 0.38
, gardener
Weight: 0.35
, old man
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be lack of soil 1.00
use soil 0.87
plough soil 0.86
neutralise soil 0.86
turn soil 0.85
help soil 0.84
know about soil 0.84
contribute to soil erosion 0.83
add fertiliser to soil 0.83
reduce soil erosion 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(farmer, be lack of soil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(gardener, turn soil)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(farmer, be lack of soil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(gardener, turn soil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(gardener, turn soil)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(farmer, be lack of soil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(farmer, be lack of soil)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(farmer, be lack of soil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(farmer, add fertiliser to soil)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(farmer, be lack of soil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(farmer, add fertiliser to soil)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(farmer, be lack of soil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(farmer, add fertiliser to soil)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(farmer, be lack of soil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(farmer, add fertiliser to soil)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(farmer, be lack of soil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(farmer, be lack of soil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(farmer, be lack of soil)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(farmer, be lack of soil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(farmer, be lack of soil)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(farmer, be lack of soil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(gardener, turn soil)