farmland: be considered natural resource

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents property
Weight: 0.60
, asset
Weight: 0.54
, land
Weight: 0.53
, thing
Weight: 0.53
, commodity
Weight: 0.52
Siblings wetland
Weight: 0.33
, cemetery
Weight: 0.32
, soybean
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered natural resource 1.00
be considered resource 0.95

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(land, be considered resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(farmland, be considered natural resource)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(farmland, be considered natural resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(land, be considered resource)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(farmland, be considered natural resource) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(land, be considered resource)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(land, be considered resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(farmland, be considered natural resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(farmland, be considered natural resource)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(farmland, be considered natural resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(farmland, be considered natural resource)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(farmland, be considered natural resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(farmland, be considered resource)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(farmland, be considered natural resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(farmland, be considered resource)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(farmland, be considered natural resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(farmland, be considered resource)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(farmland, be considered natural resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(farmland, be considered resource)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(farmland, be considered natural resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(farmland, be considered natural resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(farmland, be considered natural resource)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(farmland, be considered natural resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(farmland, be considered natural resource)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(farmland, be considered natural resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(land, be considered resource)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(farmland, be considered natural resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(land, be considered resource)