fart: is stinky

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.66
, word
Weight: 0.56
, joke
Weight: 0.48
, sound
Weight: 0.45
, term
Weight: 0.43
Siblings oh
Weight: 0.35
, crap
Weight: 0.34
, hey
Weight: 0.34
, ping pong
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is stinky 1.00
is more stinky 0.98
is smelly 0.92
be less smelly than ones 0.82
stink bad 0.82
stink 0.81
stink more than regular farts 0.79
stink way 0.79
be more pungent than farts 0.79
be infinitely more smelly than burps 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(fart, is stinky)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(crap, stink)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(fart, is stinky)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(crap, stink)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(crap, stink)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(fart, is stinky)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(fart, is stinky)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(fart, is stinky)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(fart, is smelly)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(fart, is stinky)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(fart, stink)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(fart, is stinky)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(fart, is smelly)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(fart, is stinky)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(fart, is smelly)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(fart, is stinky)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(fart, is smelly)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(fart, is stinky)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(fart, stink)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(fart, is stinky)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(fart, stink)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(fart, is stinky)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(fart, stink)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(fart, is stinky)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(fart, is stinky)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(fart, is stinky)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(fart, is stinky)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(fart, is stinky)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(fart, is stinky)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(crap, stink)