fashion: be different in past

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents item
Weight: 0.64
, garment
Weight: 0.64
, celebrity
Weight: 0.63
, event
Weight: 0.61
, discipline
Weight: 0.60
Siblings lingerie
Weight: 0.35
, denim
Weight: 0.34
, dress
Weight: 0.34
, clothing
Weight: 0.33
, handbag
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be different in past 1.00
be different 0.84
change over time 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(celebrity, be different)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(fashion, be different in past)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(fashion, be different in past)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(celebrity, be different)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(fashion, be different in past)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(celebrity, be different)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(celebrity, be different)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(fashion, be different in past)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(fashion, be different in past)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(fashion, be different in past)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(fashion, be different in past)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(fashion, be different in past)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(fashion, be different)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(fashion, be different in past)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(fashion, be different)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(fashion, be different in past)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(fashion, be different)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(fashion, be different in past)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(fashion, be different)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(fashion, be different in past)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(fashion, be different in past)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(fashion, be different in past)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(fashion, be different in past)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(fashion, be different in past)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(fashion, be different in past)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(celebrity, be different)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(fashion, be different in past)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(celebrity, be different)