fast food chain: be at new hampshire

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents restaurant
Weight: 0.74
, product
Weight: 0.56
, business
Weight: 0.56
, employer
Weight: 0.55
, service
Weight: 0.47
Siblings fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.42
, seafood restaurant
Weight: 0.38
, food store
Weight: 0.38
, italian restaurant
Weight: 0.37
, chinese restaurant
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at new hampshire 1.00
be at new york 0.79
be at new york city 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(fast food chain, be at new hampshire)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at new york)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(fast food chain, be at new hampshire)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at new york)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(fast food chain, be at new hampshire)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at new york city)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(fast food chain, be at new hampshire)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(seafood restaurant, be at new york)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(fast food chain, be at new hampshire)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be at new york)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(fast food chain, be at new hampshire)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(food store, be at new york)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(fast food chain, be at new hampshire)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(food store, be at new york)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(food store, be at new york)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(fast food chain, be at new hampshire)
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be at new york)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, be at new york)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(fast food chain, be at new hampshire)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at new york)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(chinese restaurant, be at new york)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(fast food chain, be at new hampshire)
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at new york)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, be at new york)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(fast food chain, be at new hampshire)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at new york city)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, be at new york city)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(fast food chain, be at new hampshire)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(seafood restaurant, be at new york)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(seafood restaurant, be at new york)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(fast food chain, be at new hampshire)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(fast food chain, be at new hampshire)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(fast food chain, be at new hampshire)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(fast food chain, be at new hampshire)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(fast food chain, be at new hampshire)

Typical implies Plausible

0.11
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(fast food chain, be at new hampshire)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(fast food chain, be at new hampshire)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(fast food chain, be at new hampshire)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(seafood restaurant, be at new york)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(fast food chain, be at new hampshire)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(food store, be at new york)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(fast food chain, be at new hampshire)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be at new york)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(fast food chain, be at new hampshire)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be at new york)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(fast food chain, be at new hampshire)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(chinese restaurant, be at new york)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(fast food chain, be at new hampshire)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be at new york city)