fast food chain: is popular

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents restaurant
Weight: 0.74
, product
Weight: 0.56
, business
Weight: 0.56
, employer
Weight: 0.55
, service
Weight: 0.47
Siblings taco bell
Weight: 0.72
, mcdonald
Weight: 0.61
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.42
, seafood restaurant
Weight: 0.38
, italian restaurant
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
is popular 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(fast food chain, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(taco bell, is popular)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(fast food chain, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, is popular)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(fast food chain, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(fast food restaurant, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, is popular)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(fast food chain, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(taco bell, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(taco bell, is popular)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(fast food chain, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(fast food chain, is popular)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(fast food chain, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(fast food chain, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(fast food chain, is popular)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(fast food chain, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(fast food chain, is popular)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(fast food chain, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(taco bell, is popular)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(fast food chain, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, is popular)