fast food: be at bowl alley

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.85
, junk food
Weight: 0.83
, commodity
Weight: 0.68
, food
Weight: 0.66
, industry
Weight: 0.65
Siblings chinese food
Weight: 0.75
, hot dog
Weight: 0.70
, pizza
Weight: 0.68
, meat
Weight: 0.63
, taco
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at bowl alley 1.00
be at bowl 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(food, be at bowl) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(fast food, be at bowl alley)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(food, be at bowl alley) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(fast food, be at bowl alley)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(fast food, be at bowl alley) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(food, be at bowl alley)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(fast food, be at bowl alley) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(food, be at bowl)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be at bowl alley) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(food, be at bowl alley)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be at bowl alley) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(food, be at bowl)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be at bowl alley) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, be at bowl alley)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(food, be at bowl alley) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(fast food, be at bowl alley) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(fast food, be at bowl alley)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(food, be at bowl) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(fast food, be at bowl alley) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(fast food, be at bowl alley)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(fast food, be at bowl alley) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(hot dog, be at bowl alley) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(hot dog, be at bowl alley)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(fast food, be at bowl alley) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(fast food, be at bowl alley)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(fast food, be at bowl alley) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(fast food, be at bowl alley) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be at bowl alley)

Typical implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(fast food, be at bowl alley) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(fast food, be at bowl alley)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be at bowl alley) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(food, be at bowl alley)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be at bowl alley) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(food, be at bowl)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be at bowl alley) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(hot dog, be at bowl alley)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(fast food, be at bowl alley) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(food, be at bowl alley)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(fast food, be at bowl alley) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(food, be at bowl)