fast food: be at cheap restaurant

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.85
, junk food
Weight: 0.83
, commodity
Weight: 0.68
, food
Weight: 0.66
, industry
Weight: 0.65
Siblings chinese food
Weight: 0.75
, hot dog
Weight: 0.70
, pizza
Weight: 0.68
, meat
Weight: 0.63
, taco
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at cheap restaurant 1.00
has cheap food 0.90
be used to cheap 0.89
be used to buy cheap food 0.89
be mean to be cheap food 0.87
be at fast-food restaurant 0.84
be at restaurant 0.84
be at fast food restaurant 0.84
be at in restaurant 0.84
be find in restaurant 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(fast food restaurant, has cheap food)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(fast food, be at cheap restaurant)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(fast food restaurant, be used to buy cheap food)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(fast food, be at cheap restaurant)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(food, be at fast-food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(fast food, be at cheap restaurant)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(food, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(fast food, be at cheap restaurant)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(food, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(fast food, be at cheap restaurant)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(food, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(fast food, be at cheap restaurant)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(junk food, be at fast-food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(fast food, be at cheap restaurant)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(fast food, be at cheap restaurant)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(junk food, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(fast food, be at cheap restaurant)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(food, be at restaurant)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(fast food, be at cheap restaurant)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(food, be at restaurant)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(fast food, be at cheap restaurant)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(food, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(fast food, be at cheap restaurant)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(food, be at in restaurant)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(fast food, be at cheap restaurant)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, be used to buy cheap food)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(fast food, be at cheap restaurant)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, has cheap food)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be at cheap restaurant)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be at cheap restaurant)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(food, be at in restaurant)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be at cheap restaurant)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(food, be at restaurant)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be at cheap restaurant)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(food, be at restaurant)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be at cheap restaurant)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, has cheap food)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be at cheap restaurant)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to buy cheap food)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be at cheap restaurant)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(food, be at fast-food restaurant)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be at cheap restaurant)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(pizza, be mean to be cheap food)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be at cheap restaurant)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be at cheap restaurant)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(taco, be at fast-food restaurant)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(fast food restaurant, has cheap food)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(fast food, be at cheap restaurant)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(fast food, be at cheap restaurant)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(fast food restaurant, be used to buy cheap food)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(fast food, be at cheap restaurant)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(fast food, be at cheap restaurant)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(food, be at fast-food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(fast food, be at cheap restaurant)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(fast food, be at cheap restaurant)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(food, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(fast food, be at cheap restaurant)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(fast food, be at cheap restaurant)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(food, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(fast food, be at cheap restaurant)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(fast food, be at cheap restaurant)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(food, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(fast food, be at cheap restaurant)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(fast food, be at cheap restaurant)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(junk food, be at fast-food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(fast food, be at cheap restaurant)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(fast food, be at cheap restaurant)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(fast food, be at cheap restaurant)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(hot dog, be at fast-food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(hot dog, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(fast food, be at cheap restaurant)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(pizza, be mean to be cheap food)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(pizza, be mean to be cheap food)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(fast food, be at cheap restaurant)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(taco, be at fast-food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(taco, be at fast-food restaurant)

Salient implies Plausible

0.14
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(fast food, be at cheap restaurant)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(fast food, be at cheap restaurant)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(fast food, be at cheap restaurant)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(fast food, be used to cheap)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(fast food, be at cheap restaurant)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(fast food, be at fast food restaurant)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(fast food, be at cheap restaurant)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be used to cheap)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(fast food, be at cheap restaurant)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(fast food, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(fast food, be at cheap restaurant)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(fast food, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(fast food, be at cheap restaurant)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(fast food, be at cheap restaurant)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be at fast food restaurant)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(fast food, be at cheap restaurant)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(fast food, be at fast food restaurant)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(fast food, be at cheap restaurant)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(fast food, be at fast food restaurant)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(fast food, be at cheap restaurant)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(fast food, be used to cheap)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(fast food, be at cheap restaurant)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(fast food, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(fast food, be at cheap restaurant)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(fast food, be used to cheap)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(fast food, be at cheap restaurant)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(fast food, be at cheap restaurant)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be at cheap restaurant)

Typical implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(fast food, be at cheap restaurant)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(fast food, be at cheap restaurant)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be at cheap restaurant)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, has cheap food)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be at cheap restaurant)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be used to buy cheap food)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be at cheap restaurant)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(food, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be at cheap restaurant)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(food, be at in restaurant)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be at cheap restaurant)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(food, be at restaurant)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be at cheap restaurant)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(food, be at restaurant)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be at cheap restaurant)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(junk food, be at fast-food restaurant)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be at cheap restaurant)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(taco, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be at cheap restaurant)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(pizza, be mean to be cheap food)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be at cheap restaurant)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(hot dog, be at fast-food restaurant)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(fast food, be at cheap restaurant)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, has cheap food)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(fast food, be at cheap restaurant)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be used to buy cheap food)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(fast food, be at cheap restaurant)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(food, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(fast food, be at cheap restaurant)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(food, be at in restaurant)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(fast food, be at cheap restaurant)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(food, be at restaurant)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(fast food, be at cheap restaurant)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(food, be at restaurant)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(fast food, be at cheap restaurant)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(junk food, be at fast-food restaurant)