fast food: be at hamburger joint

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.85
, junk food
Weight: 0.83
, commodity
Weight: 0.68
, food
Weight: 0.66
, industry
Weight: 0.65
Siblings chinese food
Weight: 0.75
, hot dog
Weight: 0.70
, pizza
Weight: 0.68
, meat
Weight: 0.63
, taco
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at hamburger joint 1.00
be used to hamburger 0.91
be at ham sandwich 0.77
be at pizza 0.77
be used to burger king 0.77
be eat in bun 0.76
be at pizza store 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.15
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(fast food restaurant, be used to hamburger)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(fast food, be at hamburger joint)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(food, be at pizza)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(fast food, be at hamburger joint)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fast food, be at hamburger joint)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, be used to hamburger)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fast food, be at hamburger joint)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(food, be at pizza)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be at hamburger joint)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(food, be at pizza)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be at hamburger joint)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to hamburger)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be at hamburger joint)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(meat, be at ham sandwich)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be at hamburger joint)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, be eat in bun)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be at hamburger joint)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(pizza, be at pizza store)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(fast food restaurant, be used to hamburger)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(fast food, be at hamburger joint)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(fast food, be at hamburger joint)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(food, be at pizza)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(fast food, be at hamburger joint)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(fast food, be at hamburger joint)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fast food, be at hamburger joint)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(meat, be at ham sandwich)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(meat, be at ham sandwich)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fast food, be at hamburger joint)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(hot dog, be eat in bun)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(hot dog, be eat in bun)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fast food, be at hamburger joint)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(pizza, be at pizza store)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(pizza, be at pizza store)

Salient implies Plausible

0.15
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fast food, be at hamburger joint)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(fast food, be at hamburger joint)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fast food, be at hamburger joint)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(fast food, be used to hamburger)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(fast food, be at hamburger joint)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(fast food, be used to hamburger)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fast food, be at hamburger joint)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(fast food, be used to burger king)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(fast food, be at hamburger joint)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(fast food, be used to burger king)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(fast food, be at hamburger joint)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be used to hamburger)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(fast food, be at hamburger joint)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(fast food, be used to hamburger)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(fast food, be at hamburger joint)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be used to burger king)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(fast food, be at hamburger joint)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(fast food, be used to burger king)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(fast food, be at hamburger joint)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(fast food, be at hamburger joint)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be at hamburger joint)

Typical implies Plausible

0.09
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fast food, be at hamburger joint)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(fast food, be at hamburger joint)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be at hamburger joint)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be used to hamburger)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be at hamburger joint)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(food, be at pizza)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be at hamburger joint)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(pizza, be at pizza store)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be at hamburger joint)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(hot dog, be eat in bun)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be at hamburger joint)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(meat, be at ham sandwich)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(fast food, be at hamburger joint)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be used to hamburger)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(fast food, be at hamburger joint)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(food, be at pizza)