fast food: be at styrofoam container

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.85
, junk food
Weight: 0.83
, commodity
Weight: 0.68
, food
Weight: 0.66
, industry
Weight: 0.65
Siblings chinese food
Weight: 0.75
, hot dog
Weight: 0.70
, pizza
Weight: 0.68
, meat
Weight: 0.63
, taco
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at styrofoam container 1.00
be at container 0.87
be store in tupperware 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(food, be at container)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(fast food, be at styrofoam container)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(fast food, be at styrofoam container)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(food, be at container)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be at styrofoam container)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(food, be at container)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(food, be at container)
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(fast food, be at styrofoam container)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(fast food, be at styrofoam container)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(fast food, be at styrofoam container)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(fast food, be at styrofoam container)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(fast food, be at styrofoam container)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(fast food, be at styrofoam container)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be at styrofoam container)

Typical implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(fast food, be at styrofoam container)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(fast food, be at styrofoam container)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be at styrofoam container)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(food, be at container)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(fast food, be at styrofoam container)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(food, be at container)