fast food: be bad for economy

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.85
, junk food
Weight: 0.83
, commodity
Weight: 0.68
, food
Weight: 0.66
, industry
Weight: 0.65
Siblings chinese food
Weight: 0.75
, hot dog
Weight: 0.70
, pizza
Weight: 0.68
, meat
Weight: 0.63
, taco
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for economy 1.00
be good for economy 0.98
be bad for environment 0.82
be bad for health 0.79
be good for health 0.76
be bad for body 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(junk food, be bad for health)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for economy)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(junk food, be bad for body)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for economy)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fast food restaurant, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for economy)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(fast food, be bad for economy)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, be bad for environment)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(fast food, be bad for economy)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(junk food, be bad for body)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(fast food, be bad for economy)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(junk food, be bad for health)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for economy)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be bad for environment)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for economy)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad for health)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for economy)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad for body)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for economy)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(meat, be bad for environment)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for economy)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(meat, be bad for body)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fast food restaurant, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(fast food, be bad for economy)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(fast food, be bad for economy)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(junk food, be bad for health)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(fast food, be bad for economy)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(fast food, be bad for economy)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(junk food, be bad for body)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(fast food, be bad for economy)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(fast food, be bad for economy)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(fast food, be bad for economy)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(meat, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(meat, be bad for environment)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(fast food, be bad for economy)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(meat, be bad for body)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(meat, be bad for body)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(fast food, be bad for economy)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(fast food, be bad for economy)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(fast food, be bad for economy)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(fast food, be bad for environment)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(fast food, be bad for economy)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(fast food, be bad for environment)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(fast food, be bad for economy)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for environment)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(fast food, be bad for economy)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(fast food, be bad for health)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(fast food, be bad for economy)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(fast food, be bad for health)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(fast food, be bad for economy)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for health)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(fast food, be bad for economy)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(fast food, be bad for body)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(fast food, be bad for economy)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(fast food, be bad for body)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(fast food, be bad for economy)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for body)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(fast food, be bad for economy)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for environment)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(fast food, be bad for economy)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for body)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(fast food, be bad for economy)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for health)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(fast food, be bad for economy)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be good for economy)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(fast food, be bad for economy)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(fast food, be good for health)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(fast food, be bad for economy)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(fast food, be good for economy)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(fast food, be bad for economy)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(fast food, be good for health)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(fast food, be bad for economy)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be good for health)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(fast food, be bad for economy)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(fast food, be good for health)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(fast food, be bad for economy)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(fast food, be good for economy)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.04
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(fast food, be bad for economy)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(fast food, be good for economy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(fast food, be bad for economy)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for economy)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for economy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(fast food, be bad for economy)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for economy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for economy)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be bad for environment)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for economy)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(junk food, be bad for health)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for economy)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(junk food, be bad for body)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for economy)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(meat, be bad for environment)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for economy)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(meat, be bad for body)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(fast food, be bad for economy)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be bad for environment)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(fast food, be bad for economy)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(junk food, be bad for body)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(fast food, be bad for economy)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(junk food, be bad for health)