fast food: be bad for humans

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.85
, junk food
Weight: 0.83
, commodity
Weight: 0.68
, food
Weight: 0.66
, industry
Weight: 0.65
Siblings chinese food
Weight: 0.75
, hot dog
Weight: 0.70
, pizza
Weight: 0.68
, meat
Weight: 0.63
, taco
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for humans 1.00
be bad for human body 0.83
be bad for environment 0.78
be bad for children 0.78
be bad for health 0.77
be bad for body 0.76
be good for us 0.76
be unhealthy for us 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(junk food, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for humans)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(junk food, be bad for health)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for humans)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(junk food, be unhealthy for us)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for humans)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(junk food, be bad for body)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for humans)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fast food restaurant, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for humans)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(fast food, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, be bad for environment)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(fast food, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(junk food, be bad for body)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(fast food, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(junk food, be bad for health)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(fast food, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(junk food, be unhealthy for us)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(fast food, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(junk food, be good for us)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be bad for environment)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad for health)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad for body)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be good for us)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be unhealthy for us)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(meat, be bad for environment)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(meat, be bad for body)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(junk food, be bad for health)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(fast food, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(fast food, be bad for humans)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fast food restaurant, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(fast food, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(fast food, be bad for humans)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(junk food, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(fast food, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(fast food, be bad for humans)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(junk food, be bad for body)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(fast food, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(fast food, be bad for humans)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(junk food, be unhealthy for us)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(fast food, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(fast food, be bad for humans)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(fast food, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(meat, be bad for body)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(meat, be bad for body)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(fast food, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(meat, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(meat, be bad for environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(fast food, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(fast food, be bad for humans)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(fast food, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(fast food, be bad for human body)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(fast food, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(fast food, be bad for human body)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(fast food, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for human body)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(fast food, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(fast food, be bad for children)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(fast food, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(fast food, be bad for children)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(fast food, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for children)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(fast food, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(fast food, be bad for environment)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(fast food, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(fast food, be bad for environment)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(fast food, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for environment)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(fast food, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(fast food, be bad for body)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(fast food, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(fast food, be bad for body)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(fast food, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for body)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(fast food, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(fast food, be bad for health)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(fast food, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(fast food, be bad for health)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(fast food, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for health)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(fast food, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for human body)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(fast food, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for children)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(fast food, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for body)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(fast food, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for environment)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(fast food, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for health)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(fast food, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be unhealthy for us)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(fast food, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(fast food, be unhealthy for us)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(fast food, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(fast food, be unhealthy for us)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(fast food, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(fast food, be unhealthy for us)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(fast food, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be good for us)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(fast food, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(fast food, be good for us)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(fast food, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(fast food, be good for us)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.05
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(fast food, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(fast food, be good for us)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(fast food, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for humans)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(fast food, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for humans)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be bad for environment)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(junk food, be bad for health)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(junk food, be bad for body)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(junk food, be good for us)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(junk food, be unhealthy for us)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(meat, be bad for environment)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(meat, be bad for body)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(fast food, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be bad for environment)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(fast food, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(junk food, be bad for body)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(fast food, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(junk food, be bad for health)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(fast food, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(junk food, be unhealthy for us)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(fast food, be bad for humans)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(junk food, be good for us)