fast food: be good for economy

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.85
, junk food
Weight: 0.83
, commodity
Weight: 0.68
, food
Weight: 0.66
, industry
Weight: 0.65
Siblings chinese food
Weight: 0.75
, hot dog
Weight: 0.70
, pizza
Weight: 0.68
, meat
Weight: 0.63
, taco
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for economy 1.00
be bad for economy 0.98
be bad for environment 0.80
be good for health 0.79
be good for us 0.78
be bad for health 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(junk food, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(fast food, be good for economy)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(junk food, be bad for health)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(fast food, be good for economy)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fast food restaurant, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(fast food, be good for economy)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(fast food, be good for economy)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, be bad for environment)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(fast food, be good for economy)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(junk food, be good for us)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(fast food, be good for economy)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(junk food, be bad for health)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be good for economy)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be bad for environment)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be good for economy)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be bad for health)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be good for economy)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be good for us)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be good for economy)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(meat, be bad for environment)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(junk food, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(fast food, be good for economy)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(fast food, be good for economy)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(junk food, be bad for health)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(fast food, be good for economy)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(fast food, be good for economy)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fast food restaurant, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(fast food, be good for economy)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(fast food, be good for economy)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(fast food, be good for economy)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(meat, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(meat, be bad for environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(fast food, be good for economy)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(fast food, be good for economy)

Similarity expansion

0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(fast food, be good for economy)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(fast food, be bad for economy)
0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(fast food, be good for economy)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(fast food, be bad for economy)
0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(fast food, be good for economy)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for economy)
0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(fast food, be good for economy)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for economy)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(fast food, be good for economy)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(fast food, be bad for environment)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(fast food, be good for economy)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(fast food, be bad for environment)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(fast food, be good for economy)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for environment)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(fast food, be good for economy)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for environment)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(fast food, be good for economy)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(fast food, be good for health)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(fast food, be good for economy)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(fast food, be good for health)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(fast food, be good for economy)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(fast food, be bad for health)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(fast food, be good for economy)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(fast food, be bad for health)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(fast food, be good for economy)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(fast food, be bad for health)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(fast food, be good for economy)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(fast food, be good for us)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(fast food, be good for economy)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be bad for health)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(fast food, be good for economy)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(fast food, be good for us)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(fast food, be good for economy)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(fast food, be good for health)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(fast food, be good for economy)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(fast food, be good for us)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(fast food, be good for economy)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be good for us)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(fast food, be good for economy)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be good for health)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(fast food, be good for economy)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(fast food, be good for economy)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be good for economy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(fast food, be good for economy)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(fast food, be good for economy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be good for economy)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be bad for environment)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be good for economy)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(junk food, be bad for health)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be good for economy)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(junk food, be good for us)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be good for economy)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(meat, be bad for environment)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(fast food, be good for economy)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be bad for environment)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(fast food, be good for economy)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(junk food, be good for us)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(fast food, be good for economy)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(junk food, be bad for health)