fast food: be like pizza called

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.85
, junk food
Weight: 0.83
, commodity
Weight: 0.68
, food
Weight: 0.66
, industry
Weight: 0.65
Siblings chinese food
Weight: 0.75
, hot dog
Weight: 0.70
, pizza
Weight: 0.68
, meat
Weight: 0.63
, taco
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
be like pizza called 1.00
be like pizza 0.99

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.65
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(food, be like pizza)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(fast food, be like pizza called)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(fast food, be like pizza called)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(food, be like pizza)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be like pizza called)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(food, be like pizza)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(food, be like pizza)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(fast food, be like pizza called)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(fast food, be like pizza called)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(fast food, be like pizza called)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(fast food, be like pizza called)

Similarity expansion

0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(fast food, be like pizza called)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(fast food, be like pizza)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(fast food, be like pizza called)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(fast food, be like pizza)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(fast food, be like pizza called)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(fast food, be like pizza)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(fast food, be like pizza called)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be like pizza)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(fast food, be like pizza called)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(fast food, be like pizza called)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be like pizza called)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(fast food, be like pizza called)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(fast food, be like pizza called)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be like pizza called)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, be like pizza)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(fast food, be like pizza called)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, be like pizza)