fast food: be much better in canada

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.85
, junk food
Weight: 0.83
, commodity
Weight: 0.68
, food
Weight: 0.66
, industry
Weight: 0.65
Siblings chinese food
Weight: 0.75
, hot dog
Weight: 0.70
, pizza
Weight: 0.68
, meat
Weight: 0.63
, taco
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
be much better in canada 1.00
be much more expensive in nyc 0.80
be in eugene good 0.76
be problem in america 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(fast food, be much better in canada)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(fast food, be much better in canada)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(fast food, be much better in canada)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(fast food, be much more expensive in nyc)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(fast food, be much better in canada)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(fast food, be problem in america)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(fast food, be much better in canada)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(fast food, be much more expensive in nyc)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(fast food, be much better in canada)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(fast food, be problem in america)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(fast food, be much better in canada)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(fast food, be much more expensive in nyc)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(fast food, be much better in canada)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(fast food, be problem in america)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(fast food, be much better in canada)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be problem in america)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(fast food, be much better in canada)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be much more expensive in nyc)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(fast food, be much better in canada)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(fast food, be much better in canada)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be much better in canada)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(fast food, be much better in canada)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(fast food, be much better in canada)