fast food: be problem in america

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.85
, junk food
Weight: 0.83
, commodity
Weight: 0.68
, food
Weight: 0.66
, industry
Weight: 0.65
Siblings chinese food
Weight: 0.75
, hot dog
Weight: 0.70
, pizza
Weight: 0.68
, meat
Weight: 0.63
, taco
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
be problem in america 1.00
has state problem 0.79
be much better in canada 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(junk food, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(fast food, be problem in america)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(fast food, be problem in america)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(junk food, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be problem in america)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(junk food, has state problem)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(junk food, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(fast food, be problem in america)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(fast food, be problem in america)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(fast food, be problem in america)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(fast food, be problem in america)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(fast food, be problem in america)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has state problem)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(fast food, be problem in america)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(fast food, has state problem)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(fast food, be problem in america)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(fast food, has state problem)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(fast food, be problem in america)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(fast food, has state problem)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(fast food, be problem in america)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(fast food, be much better in canada)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(fast food, be problem in america)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be much better in canada)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(fast food, be problem in america)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(fast food, be much better in canada)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(fast food, be problem in america)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(fast food, be much better in canada)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(fast food, be problem in america)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(fast food, be problem in america)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be problem in america)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(fast food, be problem in america)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(fast food, be problem in america)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be problem in america)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(junk food, has state problem)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(fast food, be problem in america)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(junk food, has state problem)