fast food: be tasty intoxicated

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.85
, junk food
Weight: 0.83
, commodity
Weight: 0.68
, food
Weight: 0.66
, industry
Weight: 0.65
Siblings chinese food
Weight: 0.75
, hot dog
Weight: 0.70
, pizza
Weight: 0.68
, meat
Weight: 0.63
, taco
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
be tasty intoxicated 1.00
is tasty 0.79
is delicious 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(food, is tasty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(fast food, be tasty intoxicated)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(food, is delicious) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(fast food, be tasty intoxicated)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(junk food, is tasty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(fast food, be tasty intoxicated)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(junk food, is delicious) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(fast food, be tasty intoxicated)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(fast food, be tasty intoxicated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(junk food, is tasty)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(fast food, be tasty intoxicated) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(food, is tasty)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(fast food, be tasty intoxicated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(junk food, is delicious)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(fast food, be tasty intoxicated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(food, is delicious)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be tasty intoxicated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is tasty)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be tasty intoxicated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is delicious)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be tasty intoxicated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(food, is tasty)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be tasty intoxicated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(food, is delicious)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be tasty intoxicated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(pizza, is delicious)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be tasty intoxicated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(pizza, is tasty)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be tasty intoxicated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(meat, is tasty)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be tasty intoxicated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(meat, is delicious)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(food, is tasty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(fast food, be tasty intoxicated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(fast food, be tasty intoxicated)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(food, is delicious) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(fast food, be tasty intoxicated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(fast food, be tasty intoxicated)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(junk food, is tasty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(fast food, be tasty intoxicated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(fast food, be tasty intoxicated)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(junk food, is delicious) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(fast food, be tasty intoxicated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(fast food, be tasty intoxicated)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(fast food, be tasty intoxicated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(meat, is tasty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(meat, is tasty)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(fast food, be tasty intoxicated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(pizza, is tasty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(pizza, is tasty)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(fast food, be tasty intoxicated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(meat, is delicious) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(meat, is delicious)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(fast food, be tasty intoxicated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(pizza, is delicious) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(pizza, is delicious)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(fast food, be tasty intoxicated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(fast food, be tasty intoxicated)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(fast food, be tasty intoxicated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(fast food, is tasty)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(fast food, be tasty intoxicated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(fast food, is tasty)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(fast food, be tasty intoxicated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(fast food, is delicious)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(fast food, be tasty intoxicated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(fast food, is delicious)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(fast food, be tasty intoxicated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(fast food, is tasty)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(fast food, be tasty intoxicated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(fast food, is delicious)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(fast food, be tasty intoxicated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(fast food, is tasty)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(fast food, be tasty intoxicated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(fast food, is delicious)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(fast food, be tasty intoxicated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(fast food, be tasty intoxicated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be tasty intoxicated)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(fast food, be tasty intoxicated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(fast food, be tasty intoxicated)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be tasty intoxicated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(junk food, is delicious)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be tasty intoxicated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(junk food, is tasty)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be tasty intoxicated) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, is tasty)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be tasty intoxicated) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, is delicious)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be tasty intoxicated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(meat, is delicious)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be tasty intoxicated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(meat, is tasty)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be tasty intoxicated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(pizza, is tasty)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be tasty intoxicated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(pizza, is delicious)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(fast food, be tasty intoxicated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(junk food, is tasty)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(fast food, be tasty intoxicated) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, is tasty)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(fast food, be tasty intoxicated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(junk food, is delicious)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(fast food, be tasty intoxicated) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, is delicious)