fast food: be used to burger king

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.85
, junk food
Weight: 0.83
, commodity
Weight: 0.68
, food
Weight: 0.66
, industry
Weight: 0.65
Siblings chinese food
Weight: 0.75
, hot dog
Weight: 0.70
, pizza
Weight: 0.68
, meat
Weight: 0.63
, taco
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to burger king 1.00
be used to hamburger 0.81
be at ham sandwich 0.78
be at pizza 0.78
be at hamburger joint 0.77
be at pizza store 0.76
be eat in bun 0.76
be find in steak hous 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.16
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(food, be at pizza)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(fast food, be used to burger king)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(fast food restaurant, be used to hamburger)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(fast food, be used to burger king)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fast food, be used to burger king)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, be used to hamburger)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fast food, be used to burger king)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(food, be at pizza)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be used to burger king)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(food, be at pizza)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be used to burger king)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to hamburger)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be used to burger king)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(meat, be at ham sandwich)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be used to burger king)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(meat, be find in steak hous)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be used to burger king)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, be eat in bun)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be used to burger king)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(pizza, be at pizza store)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(fast food restaurant, be used to hamburger)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(fast food, be used to burger king)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(fast food, be used to burger king)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(food, be at pizza)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(fast food, be used to burger king)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(fast food, be used to burger king)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fast food, be used to burger king)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(meat, be at ham sandwich)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(meat, be at ham sandwich)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fast food, be used to burger king)
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(meat, be find in steak hous)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(meat, be find in steak hous)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fast food, be used to burger king)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(hot dog, be eat in bun)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(hot dog, be eat in bun)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fast food, be used to burger king)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(pizza, be at pizza store)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(pizza, be at pizza store)

Salient implies Plausible

0.14
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fast food, be used to burger king)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(fast food, be used to burger king)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fast food, be used to burger king)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(fast food, be used to hamburger)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fast food, be used to burger king)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(fast food, be at hamburger joint)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(fast food, be used to burger king)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(fast food, be used to hamburger)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(fast food, be used to burger king)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(fast food, be at hamburger joint)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(fast food, be used to burger king)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be at hamburger joint)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(fast food, be used to burger king)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be used to hamburger)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(fast food, be used to burger king)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(fast food, be at hamburger joint)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(fast food, be used to burger king)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(fast food, be used to hamburger)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(fast food, be used to burger king)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(fast food, be used to burger king)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be used to burger king)

Typical implies Plausible

0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fast food, be used to burger king)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(fast food, be used to burger king)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be used to burger king)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be used to hamburger)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be used to burger king)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(food, be at pizza)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be used to burger king)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(pizza, be at pizza store)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be used to burger king)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(hot dog, be eat in bun)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be used to burger king)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(meat, be at ham sandwich)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be used to burger king)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(meat, be find in steak hous)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(fast food, be used to burger king)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be used to hamburger)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(fast food, be used to burger king)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(food, be at pizza)