fast food: be worse than restaurant food

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.85
, junk food
Weight: 0.83
, commodity
Weight: 0.68
, food
Weight: 0.66
, industry
Weight: 0.65
Siblings chinese food
Weight: 0.75
, hot dog
Weight: 0.70
, pizza
Weight: 0.68
, meat
Weight: 0.63
, taco
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
be worse than restaurant food 1.00
is food 0.82
be cheaper than food 0.82
be called food 0.80
be cheaper than healthy food 0.80
be better than home cooked 0.79
be called fast food 0.77
be better than home 0.76
be cheaper than vegetables 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(food, be called fast food)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(fast food, be worse than restaurant food)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(food, be called food)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(fast food, be worse than restaurant food)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than food)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(fast food, be worse than restaurant food)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than healthy food)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(fast food, be worse than restaurant food)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(fast food, be worse than restaurant food)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(junk food, is food)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(fast food, be worse than restaurant food)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(fast food, be worse than restaurant food)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(junk food, is food)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(fast food, be worse than restaurant food)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than food)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(fast food, be worse than restaurant food)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than healthy food)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(fast food, be worse than restaurant food)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(fast food, be worse than restaurant food)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(food, be called food)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(fast food, be worse than restaurant food)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(food, be called fast food)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be worse than restaurant food)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than healthy food)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be worse than restaurant food)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be worse than restaurant food)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than food)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be worse than restaurant food)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is food)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be worse than restaurant food)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(food, be called food)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be worse than restaurant food)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(food, be called fast food)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be worse than restaurant food)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(pizza, is food)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(food, be called fast food)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(fast food, be worse than restaurant food)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(fast food, be worse than restaurant food)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(food, be called food)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(fast food, be worse than restaurant food)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(fast food, be worse than restaurant food)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than food)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(fast food, be worse than restaurant food)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(fast food, be worse than restaurant food)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than healthy food)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(fast food, be worse than restaurant food)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(fast food, be worse than restaurant food)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(junk food, is food)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(fast food, be worse than restaurant food)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(fast food, be worse than restaurant food)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(fast food, be worse than restaurant food)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(fast food, be worse than restaurant food)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(fast food, be worse than restaurant food)
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(pizza, is food)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(pizza, is food)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(fast food, be worse than restaurant food)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(fast food, be worse than restaurant food)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(fast food, be worse than restaurant food)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(fast food, is food)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(fast food, be worse than restaurant food)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(fast food, be cheaper than food)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(fast food, be worse than restaurant food)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(fast food, be called food)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(fast food, be worse than restaurant food)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(fast food, be cheaper than healthy food)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(fast food, be worse than restaurant food)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(fast food, be called fast food)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(fast food, be worse than restaurant food)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(fast food, is food)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(fast food, be worse than restaurant food)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(fast food, be cheaper than food)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(fast food, be worse than restaurant food)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(fast food, be called fast food)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(fast food, be worse than restaurant food)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(fast food, be called food)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(fast food, be worse than restaurant food)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(fast food, be cheaper than healthy food)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(fast food, be worse than restaurant food)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be better than home cooked)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(fast food, be worse than restaurant food)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(fast food, is food)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(fast food, be worse than restaurant food)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(fast food, be worse than restaurant food)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(fast food, be called food)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(fast food, be worse than restaurant food)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(fast food, be cheaper than food)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(fast food, be worse than restaurant food)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(fast food, be called fast food)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(fast food, be worse than restaurant food)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(fast food, be cheaper than healthy food)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(fast food, be worse than restaurant food)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(fast food, be worse than restaurant food)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(fast food, be better than home cooked)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(fast food, be worse than restaurant food)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(fast food, be worse than restaurant food)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(fast food, be better than home cooked)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(fast food, be worse than restaurant food)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(fast food, is food)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(fast food, be worse than restaurant food)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than food)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(fast food, be worse than restaurant food)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(fast food, be better than home cooked)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(fast food, be worse than restaurant food)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be called food)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(fast food, be worse than restaurant food)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than healthy food)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(fast food, be worse than restaurant food)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be called fast food)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(fast food, be worse than restaurant food)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(fast food, be cheaper than vegetables)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(fast food, be worse than restaurant food)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(fast food, be worse than restaurant food)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be worse than restaurant food)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(fast food, be worse than restaurant food)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(fast food, be worse than restaurant food)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be worse than restaurant food)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(junk food, is food)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be worse than restaurant food)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(junk food, be cheaper than food)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be worse than restaurant food)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(junk food, be cheaper than healthy food)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be worse than restaurant food)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(food, be called food)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be worse than restaurant food)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be worse than restaurant food)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(food, be called fast food)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be worse than restaurant food)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(pizza, is food)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(fast food, be worse than restaurant food)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(junk food, is food)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(fast food, be worse than restaurant food)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(junk food, be cheaper than food)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(fast food, be worse than restaurant food)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(junk food, be cheaper than healthy food)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(fast food, be worse than restaurant food)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(food, be called food)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(fast food, be worse than restaurant food)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(junk food, be cheaper than vegetables)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(fast food, be worse than restaurant food)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(food, be called fast food)