fast food: is fast

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.85
, junk food
Weight: 0.83
, commodity
Weight: 0.68
, food
Weight: 0.66
, industry
Weight: 0.65
Siblings chinese food
Weight: 0.75
, hot dog
Weight: 0.70
, pizza
Weight: 0.68
, meat
Weight: 0.63
, taco
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
is fast 1.00
is slow 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(fast food restaurant, is slow)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(fast food, is fast)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(fast food, is fast)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, is slow)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(fast food, is fast)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, is slow)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(fast food restaurant, is slow)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(fast food, is fast)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(fast food, is fast)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(fast food, is fast)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(fast food, is fast)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(fast food, is fast)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(fast food, is slow)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(fast food, is fast)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(fast food, is slow)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(fast food, is fast)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(fast food, is slow)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(fast food, is fast)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(fast food, is slow)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(fast food, is fast)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(fast food, is fast)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(fast food, is fast)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(fast food, is fast)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(fast food, is fast)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(fast food, is fast)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, is slow)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(fast food, is fast)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, is slow)