fat: be useful in cooking

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents ingredient
Weight: 0.59
, raw material
Weight: 0.57
, characteristic
Weight: 0.57
, part
Weight: 0.57
Siblings animal fat
Weight: 0.62
, cream
Weight: 0.61
, shortening
Weight: 0.36
, sodium bicarbonate
Weight: 0.34
, protein
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be useful in cooking 1.00
be used in cooking 0.94
be used for baking 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(fat, be useful in cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(sodium bicarbonate, be used for baking)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(fat, be useful in cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(sodium bicarbonate, be used for baking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(sodium bicarbonate, be used for baking)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(fat, be useful in cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(fat, be useful in cooking)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(fat, be useful in cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(fat, be used in cooking)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(fat, be useful in cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(fat, be used in cooking)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(fat, be useful in cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(fat, be used in cooking)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(fat, be useful in cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(fat, be used in cooking)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(fat, be useful in cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(fat, be used for baking)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(fat, be useful in cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(fat, be used for baking)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(fat, be useful in cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(fat, be used for baking)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(fat, be useful in cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(fat, be used for baking)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(fat, be useful in cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(fat, be useful in cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(fat, be useful in cooking)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(fat, be useful in cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(fat, be useful in cooking)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(fat, be useful in cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(sodium bicarbonate, be used for baking)