fat: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents ingredient
Weight: 0.59
, raw material
Weight: 0.57
, characteristic
Weight: 0.57
, part
Weight: 0.57
Siblings animal fat
Weight: 0.62
, cream
Weight: 0.61
, shortening
Weight: 0.36
, sodium bicarbonate
Weight: 0.34
, protein
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has shape solid 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(characteristic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(fat, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(fat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(characteristic, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(fat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(characteristic, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(fat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(protein, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(fat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(animal fat, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(fat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(animal fat, has shape solid)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(fat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(shortening, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(fat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(protein, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(characteristic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(fat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(fat, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(fat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(protein, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(protein, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(fat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(shortening, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(shortening, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(fat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(animal fat, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(animal fat, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(fat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(protein, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(protein, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(fat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(animal fat, has shape solid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(animal fat, has shape solid)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(fat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(fat, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(fat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(fat, has quality bad)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(fat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(fat, has quality bad)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(fat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(fat, has quality bad)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(fat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(fat, has quality bad)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(fat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(fat, has shape solid)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(fat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(fat, has shape solid)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(fat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(fat, has shape solid)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(fat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(fat, has shape solid)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(fat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(fat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(fat, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(fat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(fat, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(fat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(characteristic, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(fat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(animal fat, has shape solid)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(fat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(animal fat, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(fat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(protein, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(fat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(shortening, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(fat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(protein, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(fat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(characteristic, has quality good)