favor: be called solid

Related concepts

Parents	party Weight: 0.57 , item Weight: 0.53 , argument Weight: 0.50 , word Weight: 0.49 , desire Weight: 0.49
Siblings	conservative party Weight: 0.32 , liberal party Weight: 0.32 , labour party Weight: 0.31 , third party Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be called solid	1.00
has quality good	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.31

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.39

Plausible(argument, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(favor, be called solid)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.30

Plausible(desire, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(favor, be called solid)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(favor, be called solid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Plausible(desire, has quality good)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(favor, be called solid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Plausible(argument, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Remarkable(favor, be called solid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Remarkable(argument, has quality good)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Remarkable(favor, be called solid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(desire, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Remarkable(favor, be called solid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(conservative party, has quality good)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Remarkable(favor, be called solid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(liberal party, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.25

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.39

Plausible(argument, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

Remarkable(favor, be called solid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Plausible(favor, be called solid)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.30

Plausible(desire, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

Remarkable(favor, be called solid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Plausible(favor, be called solid)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(favor, be called solid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(liberal party, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Plausible(liberal party, has quality good)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(favor, be called solid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

Remarkable(conservative party, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Plausible(conservative party, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(favor, be called solid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Salient(favor, be called solid)

Similarity expansion

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.63

Typical(favor, be called solid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(favor, has quality good)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(favor, be called solid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(favor, has quality good)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.34

Remarkable(favor, be called solid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(favor, has quality good)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.39

Salient(favor, be called solid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Salient(favor, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.39

Salient(favor, be called solid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(favor, be called solid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Remarkable(favor, be called solid)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(favor, be called solid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(favor, be called solid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Remarkable(favor, be called solid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Typical(desire, has quality good)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Remarkable(favor, be called solid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Typical(argument, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Remarkable(favor, be called solid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(liberal party, has quality good)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Remarkable(favor, be called solid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(conservative party, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.63

Typical(favor, be called solid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Typical(desire, has quality good)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.63

Typical(favor, be called solid) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Typical(argument, has quality good)