federalist: has quality better

Related concepts

Parents	political party Weight: 0.58 , republican Weight: 0.45 , group Weight: 0.41 , work Weight: 0.39 , organization Weight: 0.38
Siblings	democratic party Weight: 0.36 , liberal party Weight: 0.35 , conservative party Weight: 0.35 , nationalist Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality better	1.00
has quality good	0.94
be better than anti-federalist	0.86
be better than antifederalists	0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(work, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Typical(federalist, has quality better)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(group, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Typical(federalist, has quality better)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(federalist, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Plausible(group, has quality good)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(federalist, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(work, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.12

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(federalist, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(group, has quality good)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(federalist, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(work, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(federalist, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(nationalist, has quality good)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(federalist, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(conservative party, has quality good)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(federalist, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(liberal party, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(work, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

Remarkable(federalist, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Plausible(federalist, has quality better)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(group, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

Remarkable(federalist, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Plausible(federalist, has quality better)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(federalist, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(liberal party, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Plausible(liberal party, has quality good)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(federalist, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

Remarkable(nationalist, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Plausible(nationalist, has quality good)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(federalist, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

Remarkable(conservative party, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Plausible(conservative party, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(federalist, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Salient(federalist, has quality better)

Similarity expansion

0.78

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.97

Remarkable(federalist, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(federalist, has quality good)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.08

Typical(federalist, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Typical(federalist, be better than antifederalists)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.97

Remarkable(federalist, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(federalist, be better than anti-federalist)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.97

Remarkable(federalist, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(federalist, be better than antifederalists)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.08

Typical(federalist, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(federalist, be better than anti-federalist)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.08

Typical(federalist, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Typical(federalist, has quality good)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(federalist, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Plausible(federalist, be better than antifederalists)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.62

Salient(federalist, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Salient(federalist, has quality good)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.62

Salient(federalist, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Salient(federalist, be better than antifederalists)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(federalist, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Plausible(federalist, be better than anti-federalist)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(federalist, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Plausible(federalist, has quality good)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.62

Salient(federalist, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Salient(federalist, be better than anti-federalist)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.62

Salient(federalist, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Typical(federalist, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(federalist, has quality better)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(federalist, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Typical(federalist, has quality better)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.12

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(federalist, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(group, has quality good)

0.12

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(federalist, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(work, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(federalist, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Typical(nationalist, has quality good)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(federalist, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(liberal party, has quality good)

0.02

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(federalist, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(conservative party, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.13

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.08

Typical(federalist, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(group, has quality good)

0.13

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.08

Typical(federalist, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(work, has quality good)