fedex: has quality worst

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents carrier
Weight: 0.59
, company
Weight: 0.58
, service
Weight: 0.58
, business
Weight: 0.57
, item
Weight: 0.57
Siblings aol
Weight: 0.33
, toshiba
Weight: 0.33
, dvd player
Weight: 0.32
, cd player
Weight: 0.32
, starbucks
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality worst 1.00
has quality bad 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(fedex, has quality worst)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(toshiba, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(fedex, has quality worst)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(aol, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(fedex, has quality worst)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(aol, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(aol, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(fedex, has quality worst)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(toshiba, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(toshiba, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(fedex, has quality worst)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(fedex, has quality worst)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(fedex, has quality worst)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(fedex, has quality bad)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(fedex, has quality worst)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(fedex, has quality bad)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(fedex, has quality worst)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(fedex, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(fedex, has quality worst)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(fedex, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(fedex, has quality worst)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(fedex, has quality worst)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(fedex, has quality worst)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(fedex, has quality worst)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(fedex, has quality worst)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(fedex, has quality worst)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(toshiba, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(fedex, has quality worst)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(aol, has quality bad)