feedback: be important in communication

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents feature
Weight: 0.62
, activity
Weight: 0.60
, process
Weight: 0.60
, tool
Weight: 0.59
, concept
Weight: 0.59
Siblings preview
Weight: 0.32
, experience
Weight: 0.32
, demo
Weight: 0.32
, business activity
Weight: 0.32
, information
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in communication 1.00
be important part of communication 0.98
is communication 0.96
be critical to communication 0.94
be necessary in communication 0.94
be needed in communication 0.94
be important in communication process 0.93
be important to communication process 0.93
be essential in communication process 0.91
be very important to communication process 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(feedback, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(feedback, be important in communication)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(feedback, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(feedback, is communication)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(feedback, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(feedback, is communication)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(feedback, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(feedback, be essential in communication process)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(feedback, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(feedback, be necessary in communication)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(feedback, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(feedback, be essential in communication process)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(feedback, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(feedback, be essential in communication process)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(feedback, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(feedback, be important in communication process)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(feedback, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(feedback, be critical to communication)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(feedback, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(feedback, be important in communication process)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(feedback, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(feedback, be important in communication process)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(feedback, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(feedback, be critical to communication)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(feedback, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(feedback, be necessary in communication)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(feedback, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(feedback, be essential in communication process)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(feedback, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(feedback, be important to communication process)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(feedback, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(feedback, be very important to communication process)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(feedback, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(feedback, be important to communication process)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(feedback, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(feedback, be very important to communication process)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(feedback, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(feedback, be very important to communication process)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(feedback, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(feedback, be critical to communication)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(feedback, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(feedback, be important to communication process)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(feedback, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(feedback, be important in communication process)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(feedback, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(feedback, be necessary in communication)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(feedback, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(feedback, is communication)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(feedback, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(feedback, be important to communication process)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(feedback, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(feedback, be very important to communication process)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(feedback, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(feedback, be important part of communication)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(feedback, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(feedback, be critical to communication)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(feedback, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(feedback, be important part of communication)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(feedback, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(feedback, be important part of communication)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(feedback, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(feedback, be necessary in communication)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(feedback, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(feedback, be important part of communication)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(feedback, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(feedback, is communication)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(feedback, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(feedback, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(feedback, be important in communication)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(feedback, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(feedback, be important in communication)