feedback: be more common in homeostasis

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents feature
Weight: 0.62
, activity
Weight: 0.60
, process
Weight: 0.60
, tool
Weight: 0.59
, concept
Weight: 0.59
Siblings preview
Weight: 0.32
, experience
Weight: 0.32
, demo
Weight: 0.32
, business activity
Weight: 0.32
, information
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more common in homeostasis 1.00
be important in homeostasis 0.96
be related to homeostasis 0.95
maintain homeostasis 0.92
maintain cellular homeostasis 0.91
be involved in homeostatic regulation 0.78
be valuable in metabolic processes 0.78
is more common 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(feedback, be more common in homeostasis)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(feedback, be more common in homeostasis)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(feedback, be more common in homeostasis)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(feedback, maintain homeostasis)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(feedback, be more common in homeostasis)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(feedback, maintain homeostasis)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(feedback, be more common in homeostasis)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(feedback, maintain cellular homeostasis)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(feedback, be more common in homeostasis)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(feedback, maintain cellular homeostasis)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(feedback, be more common in homeostasis)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(feedback, be important in homeostasis)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(feedback, be more common in homeostasis)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(feedback, maintain homeostasis)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(feedback, be more common in homeostasis)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(feedback, maintain cellular homeostasis)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(feedback, be more common in homeostasis)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(feedback, be important in homeostasis)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(feedback, be more common in homeostasis)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(feedback, be important in homeostasis)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(feedback, be more common in homeostasis)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(feedback, maintain homeostasis)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(feedback, be more common in homeostasis)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(feedback, maintain cellular homeostasis)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(feedback, be more common in homeostasis)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(feedback, be related to homeostasis)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(feedback, be more common in homeostasis)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(feedback, be related to homeostasis)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(feedback, be more common in homeostasis)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(feedback, be valuable in metabolic processes)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(feedback, be more common in homeostasis)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(feedback, be valuable in metabolic processes)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(feedback, be more common in homeostasis)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(feedback, be valuable in metabolic processes)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(feedback, be more common in homeostasis)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(feedback, be related to homeostasis)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(feedback, be more common in homeostasis)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(feedback, be important in homeostasis)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(feedback, be more common in homeostasis)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(feedback, be related to homeostasis)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(feedback, be more common in homeostasis)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(feedback, be involved in homeostatic regulation)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(feedback, be more common in homeostasis)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(feedback, be valuable in metabolic processes)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(feedback, be more common in homeostasis)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(feedback, be involved in homeostatic regulation)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(feedback, be more common in homeostasis)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(feedback, be involved in homeostatic regulation)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(feedback, be more common in homeostasis)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(feedback, be involved in homeostatic regulation)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(feedback, be more common in homeostasis)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(feedback, is more common)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(feedback, be more common in homeostasis)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(feedback, is more common)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(feedback, be more common in homeostasis)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(feedback, is more common)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(feedback, be more common in homeostasis)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(feedback, is more common)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(feedback, be more common in homeostasis)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(feedback, be more common in homeostasis)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(feedback, be more common in homeostasis)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(feedback, be more common in homeostasis)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(feedback, be more common in homeostasis)