feedback: improve performance

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents feature
Weight: 0.62
, activity
Weight: 0.60
, process
Weight: 0.60
, tool
Weight: 0.59
, concept
Weight: 0.59
Siblings preview
Weight: 0.32
, experience
Weight: 0.32
, demo
Weight: 0.32
, business activity
Weight: 0.32
, information
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
improve performance 1.00
improve writing 0.80
enhance effectiveness of speaking 0.78
enhance effectiveness of public speaking 0.77
has quality good 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(tool, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(feedback, improve performance)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(feedback, improve performance)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(tool, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(feedback, improve performance)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(tool, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(feedback, improve performance)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(experience, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(tool, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(feedback, improve performance)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(feedback, improve performance)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(feedback, improve performance)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(experience, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(experience, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(feedback, improve performance)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(feedback, improve performance)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(feedback, improve performance)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(feedback, improve writing)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(feedback, improve performance)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(feedback, improve writing)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(feedback, improve performance)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(feedback, enhance effectiveness of public speaking)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(feedback, improve performance)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(feedback, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(feedback, improve performance)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(feedback, improve writing)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(feedback, improve performance)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(feedback, improve writing)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(feedback, improve performance)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(feedback, enhance effectiveness of public speaking)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(feedback, improve performance)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(feedback, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(feedback, improve performance)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(feedback, enhance effectiveness of public speaking)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(feedback, improve performance)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(feedback, enhance effectiveness of public speaking)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(feedback, improve performance)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(feedback, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(feedback, improve performance)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(feedback, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(feedback, improve performance)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(feedback, improve performance)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(feedback, improve performance)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(feedback, improve performance)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(feedback, improve performance)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(feedback, improve performance)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(tool, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(feedback, improve performance)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(experience, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(feedback, improve performance)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(tool, has quality good)