female circumcision: has quality good

Related concepts

Parents	practice Weight: 0.65 , thing Weight: 0.59 , woman Weight: 0.58 , ritual Weight: 0.57 , atrocity Weight: 0.55
Siblings	circumcision Weight: 0.37 , pregnant woman Weight: 0.35 , old woman Weight: 0.34 , homosexual Weight: 0.33 , monogamy Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality good	1.00
has quality bad	0.96
has quality wrong	0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(ritual, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(female circumcision, has quality good)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(practice, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(female circumcision, has quality good)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(practice, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(female circumcision, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(female circumcision, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Plausible(practice, has quality good)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(female circumcision, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Plausible(ritual, has quality good)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(female circumcision, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Plausible(practice, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(female circumcision, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(practice, has quality bad)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(female circumcision, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(ritual, has quality good)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(female circumcision, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(practice, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(female circumcision, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Remarkable(monogamy, has quality bad)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(female circumcision, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(monogamy, has quality good)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(female circumcision, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(circumcision, has quality good)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(female circumcision, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(circumcision, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(ritual, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

Remarkable(female circumcision, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Plausible(female circumcision, has quality good)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(practice, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

Remarkable(female circumcision, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Plausible(female circumcision, has quality good)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(practice, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

Remarkable(female circumcision, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Plausible(female circumcision, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(female circumcision, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

Remarkable(circumcision, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Plausible(circumcision, has quality good)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(female circumcision, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

Remarkable(monogamy, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Plausible(monogamy, has quality good)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(female circumcision, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

Remarkable(circumcision, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Plausible(circumcision, has quality bad)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(female circumcision, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

Remarkable(monogamy, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Plausible(monogamy, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(female circumcision, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Salient(female circumcision, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.78

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.95

Salient(female circumcision, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Salient(female circumcision, has quality bad)

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.88

Typical(female circumcision, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Typical(female circumcision, has quality bad)

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(female circumcision, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Plausible(female circumcision, has quality bad)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.95

Salient(female circumcision, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Salient(female circumcision, has quality wrong)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(female circumcision, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Plausible(female circumcision, has quality wrong)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.88

Typical(female circumcision, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Typical(female circumcision, has quality wrong)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.72

Remarkable(female circumcision, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(female circumcision, has quality wrong)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.72

Remarkable(female circumcision, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(female circumcision, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.95

Salient(female circumcision, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(female circumcision, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(female circumcision, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(female circumcision, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(female circumcision, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(female circumcision, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(practice, has quality good)

0.21

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(female circumcision, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Typical(practice, has quality bad)

0.20

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(female circumcision, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(ritual, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(female circumcision, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Typical(monogamy, has quality bad)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(female circumcision, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Typical(monogamy, has quality good)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(female circumcision, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(circumcision, has quality bad)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(female circumcision, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(circumcision, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.88

Typical(female circumcision, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(practice, has quality good)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.88

Typical(female circumcision, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(ritual, has quality good)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.88

Typical(female circumcision, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Typical(practice, has quality bad)