ferret: be at forrest

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dog
Weight: 0.59
, predator
Weight: 0.57
, wild animal
Weight: 0.56
, pet
Weight: 0.54
, animal
Weight: 0.51
Siblings beagle
Weight: 0.35
, small dog
Weight: 0.34
, cocker spaniel
Weight: 0.34
, bloodhound
Weight: 0.34
, labrador retriever
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at forrest 1.00
be at montana 0.78
be at wyoming 0.78
be at georgia 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(ferret, be at forrest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(small dog, be at georgia)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(ferret, be at forrest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(small dog, be at georgia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(small dog, be at georgia)

Salient implies Plausible

0.14
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(ferret, be at forrest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(ferret, be at forrest)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(ferret, be at forrest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(ferret, be at montana)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(ferret, be at forrest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(ferret, be at wyoming)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(ferret, be at forrest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(ferret, be at montana)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(ferret, be at forrest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(ferret, be at wyoming)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(ferret, be at forrest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(ferret, be at wyoming)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(ferret, be at forrest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(ferret, be at montana)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(ferret, be at forrest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(ferret, be at montana)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(ferret, be at forrest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(ferret, be at wyoming)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(ferret, be at forrest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(ferret, be at forrest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(ferret, be at forrest)

Typical implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(ferret, be at forrest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(ferret, be at forrest)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(ferret, be at forrest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(small dog, be at georgia)