:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(ferret, hiss)
⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(beagle, whine)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(ferret, hiss)
⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(bloodhound, whine)
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(ferret, hiss)
⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(beagle, whine)
⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(beagle, whine)
Salient implies Plausible
0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(ferret, hiss)
⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(ferret, hiss)
Similarity expansion
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(ferret, hiss)
⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(ferret, hiss)
⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(ferret, hiss)
Typical implies Plausible
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(ferret, hiss)
⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(ferret, hiss)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(ferret, hiss)
⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(beagle, whine)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(ferret, hiss)
⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(bloodhound, whine)