fertilizer: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents commodity
Weight: 0.64
, material
Weight: 0.63
, substance
Weight: 0.60
, chemical
Weight: 0.58
Siblings ammonium nitrate
Weight: 0.76
, ammonia
Weight: 0.70
, manure
Weight: 0.62
, potassium sulfate
Weight: 0.58
, flourish
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
be bad for water 0.81
be bad for environment 0.80
affect water quality 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(fertilizer, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(flourish, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(fertilizer, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(manure, be bad for environment)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(fertilizer, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(ammonia, be bad for environment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fertilizer, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(flourish, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(flourish, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fertilizer, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(manure, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(manure, be bad for environment)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fertilizer, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(ammonia, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(ammonia, be bad for environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fertilizer, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(fertilizer, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fertilizer, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(fertilizer, be bad for water)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(fertilizer, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(fertilizer, be bad for water)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(fertilizer, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(fertilizer, be bad for water)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(fertilizer, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(fertilizer, be bad for water)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(fertilizer, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(fertilizer, affect water quality)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(fertilizer, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(fertilizer, be bad for environment)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(fertilizer, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(fertilizer, be bad for environment)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fertilizer, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(fertilizer, be bad for environment)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fertilizer, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(fertilizer, affect water quality)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(fertilizer, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(fertilizer, be bad for environment)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(fertilizer, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(fertilizer, affect water quality)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(fertilizer, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(fertilizer, affect water quality)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(fertilizer, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(fertilizer, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(fertilizer, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fertilizer, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(fertilizer, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(fertilizer, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(flourish, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(fertilizer, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(manure, be bad for environment)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(fertilizer, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(ammonia, be bad for environment)