fiat: has quality worth

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents company
Weight: 0.56
, car
Weight: 0.54
, thing
Weight: 0.52
, brand
Weight: 0.52
, manufacturer
Weight: 0.51
Siblings ferrari
Weight: 0.31
, venture capitalist
Weight: 0.31
, mercedes benz
Weight: 0.31
, xerox
Weight: 0.31
, imperial
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality worth 1.00
has quality bad 0.82
have value 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(fiat, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(imperial, has quality worth)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(fiat, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(imperial, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(fiat, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(venture capitalist, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(fiat, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(xerox, has quality worth)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(fiat, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(xerox, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(xerox, has quality worth)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(fiat, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(imperial, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(imperial, has quality worth)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(fiat, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(venture capitalist, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(venture capitalist, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(fiat, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(imperial, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(imperial, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(fiat, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(fiat, has quality worth)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(fiat, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(fiat, have value)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(fiat, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(fiat, have value)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(fiat, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(fiat, have value)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(fiat, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(fiat, have value)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(fiat, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(fiat, has quality bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(fiat, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(fiat, has quality bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(fiat, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(fiat, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(fiat, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(fiat, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(fiat, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(fiat, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(fiat, has quality worth)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(fiat, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(fiat, has quality worth)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(fiat, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(imperial, has quality worth)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(fiat, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(xerox, has quality worth)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(fiat, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(venture capitalist, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(fiat, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(imperial, has quality bad)