fiat: have bad reputation

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents company
Weight: 0.56
, car
Weight: 0.54
, thing
Weight: 0.52
, brand
Weight: 0.52
, manufacturer
Weight: 0.51
Siblings ferrari
Weight: 0.31
, venture capitalist
Weight: 0.31
, mercedes benz
Weight: 0.31
, xerox
Weight: 0.31
, imperial
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
have bad reputation 1.00
have reputation 0.97
has quality bad 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(fiat, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(imperial, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(fiat, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(venture capitalist, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(fiat, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(ferrari, have reputation)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(fiat, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(ferrari, have reputation)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(ferrari, have reputation)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(fiat, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(venture capitalist, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(venture capitalist, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(fiat, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(imperial, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(imperial, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(fiat, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(fiat, have bad reputation)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(fiat, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(fiat, have reputation)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(fiat, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(fiat, have reputation)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(fiat, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(fiat, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(fiat, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(fiat, have reputation)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(fiat, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(fiat, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(fiat, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(fiat, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(fiat, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(fiat, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(fiat, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(fiat, have reputation)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(fiat, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(fiat, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(fiat, have bad reputation)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(fiat, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(fiat, have bad reputation)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(fiat, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(ferrari, have reputation)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(fiat, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(venture capitalist, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(fiat, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(imperial, has quality bad)