fiber: be better than copper

Related concepts

Parents	optical fiber Weight: 0.76 , shape Weight: 0.57 , product Weight: 0.57 , factor Weight: 0.56
Siblings	wood pulp Weight: 0.70 , bamboo Weight: 0.69 , nylon Weight: 0.67 , fiberglass Weight: 0.64 , acetate Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be better than copper	1.00
be much faster than copper	0.95
is optic cable better than copper cable	0.83
be stronger than steel	0.82
be preferred over copper wires for communication	0.82
be better than wood	0.79
be better than plastic	0.77
is gold	0.77
be much better than others	0.76
suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.33

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Typical(fiber, be better than copper)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.02

Plausible(optical fiber, be better than copper) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Typical(fiber, be better than copper)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.03

Plausible(optical fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Typical(fiber, be better than copper)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.41

Plausible(fiber, be better than copper) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Plausible(optical fiber, be better than copper)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.41

Plausible(fiber, be better than copper) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Plausible(optical fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.41

Plausible(fiber, be better than copper) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Plausible(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Remarkable(fiber, be better than copper) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Remarkable(optical fiber, be better than copper)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Remarkable(fiber, be better than copper) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Remarkable(fiber, be better than copper) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Remarkable(optical fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Remarkable(fiber, be better than copper) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Remarkable(bamboo, be stronger than steel)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Remarkable(fiber, be better than copper) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Remarkable(bamboo, be better than plastic)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Remarkable(fiber, be better than copper) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(bamboo, be better than wood)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.02

Plausible(optical fiber, be better than copper) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

Remarkable(fiber, be better than copper) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Plausible(fiber, be better than copper)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

Remarkable(fiber, be better than copper) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Plausible(fiber, be better than copper)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.03

Plausible(optical fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

Remarkable(fiber, be better than copper) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Plausible(fiber, be better than copper)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.41

Plausible(fiber, be better than copper) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

Remarkable(bamboo, be stronger than steel) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Plausible(bamboo, be stronger than steel)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.41

Plausible(fiber, be better than copper) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

Remarkable(bamboo, be better than wood) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Plausible(bamboo, be better than wood)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.41

Plausible(fiber, be better than copper) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

Remarkable(bamboo, be better than plastic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Plausible(bamboo, be better than plastic)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.41

Plausible(fiber, be better than copper) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Salient(fiber, be better than copper)

Similarity expansion

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.36

Remarkable(fiber, be better than copper) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.36

Remarkable(fiber, be better than copper) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.55

Typical(fiber, be better than copper) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.55

Typical(fiber, be better than copper) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.41

Plausible(fiber, be better than copper) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Plausible(fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.34

Salient(fiber, be better than copper) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Salient(fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.41

Plausible(fiber, be better than copper) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Plausible(fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.34

Salient(fiber, be better than copper) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Salient(fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.34

Salient(fiber, be better than copper) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Typical(fiber, be better than copper) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Remarkable(fiber, be better than copper)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.41

Plausible(fiber, be better than copper) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Typical(fiber, be better than copper)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.48

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Remarkable(fiber, be better than copper) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Typical(optical fiber, be better than copper)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Remarkable(fiber, be better than copper) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Typical(optical fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Remarkable(fiber, be better than copper) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Typical(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Remarkable(fiber, be better than copper) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Typical(bamboo, be stronger than steel)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Remarkable(fiber, be better than copper) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Typical(bamboo, be better than plastic)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Remarkable(fiber, be better than copper) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(bamboo, be better than wood)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.55

Typical(fiber, be better than copper) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Typical(optical fiber, be better than copper)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.55

Typical(fiber, be better than copper) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Typical(optical fiber, suffer from less interference by other radiations than copper wire)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.55

Typical(fiber, be better than copper) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Typical(optical fiber, be preferred over copper wires for communication)