fiber: be good reducing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents optical fiber
Weight: 0.76
, shape
Weight: 0.57
, product
Weight: 0.57
, factor
Weight: 0.56
Siblings wood pulp
Weight: 0.70
, bamboo
Weight: 0.69
, nylon
Weight: 0.67
, fiberglass
Weight: 0.64
, acetate
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good reducing 1.00
reduce heat loss 0.77
be increased 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(fiber, be good reducing)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(fiberglass, reduce heat loss)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(fiber, be good reducing)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(fiberglass, reduce heat loss)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(fiberglass, reduce heat loss)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(fiber, be good reducing)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(fiber, be good reducing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(fiber, be good reducing)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(fiber, be good reducing)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(fiber, be good reducing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(fiber, be good reducing)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(fiber, be good reducing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(fiber, be good reducing)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(fiberglass, reduce heat loss)