fiber: is cable immune to interference

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents optical fiber
Weight: 0.76
, shape
Weight: 0.57
, product
Weight: 0.57
, factor
Weight: 0.56
Siblings wood pulp
Weight: 0.70
, bamboo
Weight: 0.69
, nylon
Weight: 0.67
, fiberglass
Weight: 0.64
, acetate
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
is cable immune to interference 1.00
is optic cable immune to interference 0.96
is cable immune to electromagnetic interference 0.95
is optic cable immune to electromagnetic interference 0.92
is cable immune 0.91
is optic cable immune 0.86
is cable 0.79
be cable 0.79
be cable able 0.78
is optic cable better than copper cable 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(optical fiber, is cable)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(fiber, is cable immune to interference)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(fiber, is cable immune to interference)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(optical fiber, is cable)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(fiber, is cable immune to interference)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(optical fiber, is cable)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.21
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(optical fiber, is cable)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(fiber, is cable immune to interference)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(fiber, is cable immune to interference)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(fiber, is cable immune to interference)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(fiber, is cable immune to interference)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(fiber, is cable immune to interference)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(fiber, is cable immune to electromagnetic interference)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(fiber, is cable immune to interference)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(fiber, is cable immune to electromagnetic interference)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(fiber, is cable immune to interference)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(fiber, is cable immune to electromagnetic interference)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(fiber, is cable immune to interference)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(fiber, is optic cable immune to electromagnetic interference)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(fiber, is cable immune to interference)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(fiber, is optic cable immune to interference)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(fiber, is cable immune to interference)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(fiber, is optic cable immune to interference)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(fiber, is cable immune to interference)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(fiber, is cable)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(fiber, is cable immune to interference)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(fiber, be cable)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(fiber, is cable immune to interference)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(fiber, is cable)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(fiber, is cable immune to interference)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(fiber, be cable)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(fiber, is cable immune to interference)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(fiber, is cable immune to electromagnetic interference)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(fiber, is cable immune to interference)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(fiber, is cable)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(fiber, is cable immune to interference)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(fiber, be cable)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(fiber, is cable immune to interference)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(fiber, is optic cable immune to electromagnetic interference)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(fiber, is cable immune to interference)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(fiber, be cable)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(fiber, is cable immune to interference)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(fiber, is cable)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(fiber, is cable immune to interference)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(fiber, is optic cable immune to electromagnetic interference)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(fiber, is cable immune to interference)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(fiber, is optic cable immune to interference)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(fiber, is cable immune to interference)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(fiber, is optic cable immune to electromagnetic interference)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(fiber, is cable immune to interference)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(fiber, is optic cable immune to interference)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(fiber, is cable immune to interference)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(fiber, is cable immune to interference)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(fiber, is cable immune to interference)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(fiber, is cable immune to interference)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(fiber, is cable immune to interference)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(fiber, is cable immune to interference)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(optical fiber, is cable)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(fiber, is cable immune to interference)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(optical fiber, is cable)