fibre: be better than copper

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents technology
Weight: 0.52
, item
Weight: 0.52
, protocol
Weight: 0.47
, product
Weight: 0.47
, raw material
Weight: 0.46
Siblings line item
Weight: 0.28
, computer science
Weight: 0.28
, computer hardware
Weight: 0.27
, fiber optics
Weight: 0.27
, dairy product
Weight: 0.27

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than copper 1.00
be faster than copper 0.96
be better than adsl 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(fibre, be better than copper)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(fiber optics, be faster than copper)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(fibre, be better than copper)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(fiber optics, be faster than copper)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(fiber optics, be faster than copper)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(fibre, be better than copper)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(fibre, be better than copper)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(fibre, be better than copper)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(fibre, be faster than copper)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(fibre, be better than copper)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(fibre, be faster than copper)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(fibre, be better than copper)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(fibre, be faster than copper)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(fibre, be better than copper)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(fibre, be faster than copper)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(fibre, be better than copper)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(fibre, be better than adsl)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(fibre, be better than copper)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(fibre, be better than adsl)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(fibre, be better than copper)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(fibre, be better than adsl)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(fibre, be better than copper)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(fibre, be better than adsl)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(fibre, be better than copper)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(fibre, be better than copper)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(fibre, be better than copper)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(fibre, be better than copper)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(fibre, be better than copper)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(fibre, be better than copper)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(fiber optics, be faster than copper)