fibre: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents technology
Weight: 0.52
, item
Weight: 0.52
, protocol
Weight: 0.47
, product
Weight: 0.47
, raw material
Weight: 0.46
Siblings line item
Weight: 0.28
, computer science
Weight: 0.28
, computer hardware
Weight: 0.27
, fiber optics
Weight: 0.27
, dairy product
Weight: 0.27

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality better 0.94
be important for good health 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(technology, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(fibre, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fibre, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(technology, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(fibre, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(technology, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(fibre, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(fiber optics, has quality better)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(fibre, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(computer science, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(fibre, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(line item, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(technology, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(fibre, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(fibre, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fibre, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(line item, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(line item, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fibre, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(computer science, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(computer science, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fibre, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(fiber optics, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(fiber optics, has quality better)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fibre, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(fibre, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(fibre, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(fibre, has quality better)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(fibre, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(fibre, has quality better)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fibre, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(fibre, has quality better)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(fibre, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(fibre, has quality better)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(fibre, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(fibre, be important for good health)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(fibre, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(fibre, be important for good health)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(fibre, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(fibre, be important for good health)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fibre, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(fibre, be important for good health)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(fibre, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(fibre, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(fibre, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(fibre, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(fibre, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(fibre, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(technology, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(fibre, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(line item, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(fibre, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(computer science, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(fibre, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(fiber optics, has quality better)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(fibre, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(technology, has quality good)